WEBTECH.IT is a product engineering team in Jaipur. We take on web platforms, mobile apps, cloud work and the data behind them for companies that need someone to own the build end to end not just fill a seat. A lot of our work starts as a rescue, a rewrite, or a first version that has to be right.
We are not a full-service agency and we do not pretend to be. There is no marketing team here, no SEO retainer, no branding division. Everything below is work our own engineers do.
Most of what we do. You describe the product; we design it, build it and put it in front of real users.
Native when the app genuinely needs the hardware, cross-platform when it does not. We will tell you which one you need before you commit to either.
Getting your software onto infrastructure that does not wake anyone up at three in the morning, and keeping the monthly bill honest.
Reporting the finance team actually trusts, and AI features built to do one specific job rather than to look good in a demo.
Testers who read the requirements properly, plus the automation that stops the same bug arriving for a third time.
Taking over code somebody else wrote, or keeping what we built running long after the launch.
Company size matters less to us than what state the project is in. These four cover almost everything that comes through the door and the line each one tends to open with.
We have promised a demo in eight weeks and all we have is a Figma file.
You have funding or early revenue and a date you have promised somebody. You need a team that can get from a Figma file to the App Store without being managed every day.
Everything runs on one spreadsheet, and one person understands it.
The shared spreadsheet. The Access database. The PHP system the original developer left behind in 2014. We have moved a lot of these, and we know where the bodies usually are.
My team is good. There are four of them and the roadmap needs nine.
Your engineers are good, there just are not enough of them. We add two to six people who work in your repository, your standup and your process rather than running a parallel one.
Our last developer stopped replying about three months ago.
It happens far more often than anyone admits publicly. We audit what you have, tell you honestly whether it is worth fixing or restarting, and then do that.
This is the actual sequence, not an idealised version of it. How long each stage takes depends on the project, so we put those numbers in your proposal rather than on a web page.
A short call, no slide deck. We ask what you are building, who it is for, what has already been tried and what the budget honestly is. If we are the wrong fit, you will hear that on the call rather than a week later.
Within about a week you get a document: what we will build, what we are deliberately leaving out, how long it takes, what it costs and who from our side is on it. No proposal we send runs past eight pages.
Wireframes first, then screens, reviewed with you before anyone writes production code. Changing a frame in Figma costs an hour. Changing a screen that is already built costs a week, and everybody pretends to be surprised.
A working demo link every second Friday, and access to the board the whole way through. Every change is reviewed by a second engineer before it merges. Nothing goes to a client environment without passing the test suite.
We handle the deployment, the store submissions, the DNS, the certificates and the monitoring. You already hold the credentials, the repository and the documentation, because we set those up in your name in week one.
Either a monthly retainer with a named engineer who knows the system, or a two-week handover to your own team. Both are fine with us. We have done the second one plenty of times and nobody has needed to call us back.
Domain knowledge saves weeks of requirement-gathering. If yours is not here, say so anyway half of these were new to us once.
Multi-tenant platforms, billing, admin
Lab reporting, patient portals, scheduling
Onboarding, KYC flows, collections
Dispatch, tracking, driver apps
Storefronts, inventory, order management
Listings, CRM, site progress apps
Course delivery, assessments, proctoring
Production tracking, quality logs, dashboards
Booking engines, channel integrations
Every development company says it communicates well and writes clean code. These are the things we will actually be held to, and the ones clients bring up when they refer us.
The engineers on your kickoff call are the engineers who write the code. We do not move someone onto a larger account halfway through, and we do not put a senior on the pitch and a junior on the build.
Jaipur runs on IST, which leaves a real working overlap with most of the world rather than a handover email sent as everyone logs off. Where a project needs more of one, we run a genuinely shifted shift instead of pretending time zones do not exist.
Your GitHub organisation, your AWS account, your Apple developer account. We are collaborators on your infrastructure and never the owner of it. Walking away from us should cost you a morning, not a lawyer.
Anything outside the agreed scope gets quoted and approved before work starts on it. We have never sent a client a bill they had not already seen and said yes to.
Setup instructions, architecture notes, and a short record of any decision you would otherwise have to reverse-engineer from the code. It ships with the repository, not three weeks after the invoice.
A lot of studios quietly refuse this work. Close to half our long-running clients came to us with an inherited codebase and a developer who had stopped answering email.
We keep the list short on purpose. Everything here is something several people on the team have shipped and can support, rather than everything anyone has ever tried.
A paragraph or a hundred-page specification both are fine. We read everything that arrives, and the reply usually comes back with questions rather than a price. If it turns out we are not the right team for it, we will say so and point you somewhere better.
